Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygems - the Ruby standard for packaging ruby libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220683 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-01-05 12:22 EST ------- To thet best of my knowledge, teh guidelines only require that the license is included in the rpm if it is distributed by upstream in the tarball - the lack of a license file should therefore not block this review. There's been nothing but crickets so far on my request to add the license to the tarball, so it might be a little bit before upstream fixes it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review