[Bug 220683] Review Request: rubygems - the Ruby standard for packaging ruby libraries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rubygems - the Ruby standard for packaging ruby libraries


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220683





------- Additional Comments From kevin@xxxxxxxxx  2007-01-03 20:19 EST -------
1. ok.
 
2. ok. Yeah, it's really not possible to tell currently what the license is
based on just looking at the package as shipped. ;( 
Do you know when they might address this? I hate to approve and ship the package
without a known for sure license. I wish they would have at least said in the
package that the license was ruby/GPL, but they didn't. 

3. ok. 

4. ok, looks good here. 

5. ah, ok. Not sure why I was thinking that there was one. 

So the blocker I see left is including the license... do you think that will
occur pretty soon?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]