Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygems - the Ruby standard for packaging ruby libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220683 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-01-02 19:48 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Issues: 1. Changed to use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT everywhere 2. It's actually dual licensed (Ruby + GPL); no license texts are included in the distribution tarball. I opened a bug upstream to include them. I changed the license field to be the same as the one for ruby - rpmlint doesn't like it, but it's at least consistent now. 3. Changed 4. Good catch - fixed, should now always be /usr/lib/ruby/gems 5. You do need the ruby BR - there's no ruby-devel BR New files uploaded: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/spec/rubygems.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/rubygems-0.9.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review