[Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195





------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx  2006-12-21 13:06 EST -------
I would just call it "imp".  IMP is a web application that happens to require
the Horde framework, but I wouldn't call it a subpackage of Horde.

About the registry.php file, one thing I noticed when diffing against
registry.php.dist is that the original file has moved on a bit, and thus there
are many differences between the file you ship and the one in the source.  Would
you consider rebasing it?

I still can't decide about the configuration files, but I've found myself doing
plenty of manual edits to those files lately so I'm leaning towards /etc being
more appropriate.  After all, they're still config files, not random internal state.

I do think it would be a good idea to mention your localhost issue in the
readme; it certainly can't hurt.

I'm in the FESCo meeting at the moment, so I'll take a more complete look at
this a bit later.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]