Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-12-21 12:39 EST ------- Now that I'm starting to think about packaging horde applications, what is the appropriate naming convention, "horde-imp" or just "imp"? If we go with horde-imp (which seems the logical choice to me), should we try to "Provides: imp" for people who try: "yum install imp" or should we expect them to know imp is a subpackage of the horde framework? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review