Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flex-old - Legacy version of flex, a tool for creating scanners https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220381 pmachata@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(pmachata@xxxxxxxxx| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From pmachata@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-12-21 12:51 EST ------- > Yes, but all of these are moving to Extras with the merger. Oh, I idn't know that. So I'll have to set up extras account sooner or later. Good to know. > Yes, but all of these are moving to Extras with the merger. Unless there is > specific reason (needed to build something else) for this new package to go > into Core, it must go into Extras instead. Well, that will turn out. The whole point of providing compat flex is that the changes between 2.5.4 and 2.5.33 were very internal, and there are lots of them. I don't want to be stuck with the same ancient version of flex forever, .33 has interesting features, and people are requesting it for some time already. But on the other hand, I don't dare upgrade without a fallback. So some components actually may end up with BuildRequires: compat-flex, although this should be rare, and hopefully temporary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review