[Bug 680936] New: Review Request: libssh2-python - Python bindings for the libssh2 library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: libssh2-python - Python bindings for the libssh2 library

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680936

           Summary: Review Request: libssh2-python - Python bindings for
                    the libssh2 library
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
        ReportedBy: clalance@xxxxxxxxxx
         QAContact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
                CC: notting@xxxxxxxxxx, fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/clalance/libssh2-python/libssh2-python.spec
SRPM URL:
http://people.redhat.com/clalance/libssh2-python/libssh2-python-0.7.1-1.fc14.src.rpm
Description: libssh2-python is a python binding for the libssh2 library.


[clalance@localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint libssh2-python.spec
libssh2-python.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: libssh2-python-0.7.1.tar.gz
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
[clalance@localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint
/home/clalance/rpmbuild/SRPMS/libssh2-python-0.7.1-1.fc14.src.rpm
libssh2-python.src: W: invalid-license LGPL
libssh2-python.src: W: invalid-url Source0: libssh2-python-0.7.1.tar.gz
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

The upstream project does not have tarball releases, so I believe the
"invalid-url" warning is acceptable.  The "invalid-license" is clearly more of
an issue.  The upstream git repository just says "LGPL", which I have
reproduced here.  I have been in contact with the author of the binding for
clarification of his license.  Once he responds, I will update the SPEC file
accordingly.

Finally, I know that the fedora guidelines prefer "python-<foo>" to
"<foo>-python", but the upstream author of the bindings prefers
"libssh2-python", which is what I've done here.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]