Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scipy - array processing for numbers, strings, records, and objects. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218195 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx 2006-12-03 17:13 EST ------- The rpmlint warnings concerning the .h files down in the python site-packages tree are a matter of interpretation I think. Since these files are not in /usr/include/python2.4/ I'm not sure there is an expectation that they are to be built against. There are many python packages which continue to place .h files down in the site-packages tree without splitting into a -devel. The only python module packages that I am aware of that uses a devel subpackage install their .h files into the /usr/include/python2.4/ tree. python-ogg-devel for example. But even that isn't consistently done, python-numarry doesn't make the effort. I don't have a problem splitting this stuff off, I just don't want to set a new packaging policy precedent in the process. If you could point me to a python module package (ie not a graphical end-user application) which has .h files down in site-packages and splits out a -devel subpackage I'd like to look over its spec as a reference. I fixed the %install section issue and the silly dot at the end of the summar. Can you tell I'm a couple of months out of practise. I'm going to play with the requires and buildrequires a little to see if I can answer the questions. For example, I don't know if this will work with fftw version 3....yet. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review