Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scipy - array processing for numbers, strings, records, and objects. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218195 jamatos@xxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jamatos@xxxxxxxx 2006-12-03 18:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > The rpmlint warnings concerning the .h files down in the python site-packages > tree are a matter of interpretation I think. Since these files are not in > /usr/include/python2.4/ I'm not sure there is an expectation that they are to be > built against. There are many python packages which continue to place .h files > down in the site-packages tree without splitting into a -devel. > > The only python module packages that I am aware of that uses a devel subpackage > install their .h files into the /usr/include/python2.4/ tree. python-ogg-devel > for example. But even that isn't consistently done, python-numarry doesn't > make the effort. I don't have a problem splitting this stuff off, I just don't > want to set a new packaging policy precedent in the process. > > If you could point me to a python module package (ie not a graphical end-user > application) which has .h files down in site-packages and splits out a -devel > subpackage I'd like to look over its spec as a reference. You are right. This is not blocking, more like a wish. :-) > I fixed the %install section issue and the silly dot at the end of the summar. Good, I changed the status of this review to approved. > Can you tell I'm a couple of months out of practise. I'm going to play with the > requires and buildrequires a little to see if I can answer the questions. For > example, I don't know if this will work with fftw version 3....yet. From the build log: fft_opt_info: fftw3_info: libraries fftw3 not found in /usr/local/lib libraries fftw3 not found in /usr/lib fftw3 not found NOT AVAILABLE fftw2_info: FOUND: libraries = ['rfftw', 'fftw'] library_dirs = ['/usr/lib64'] define_macros = [('SCIPY_FFTW_H', None)] include_dirs = ['/usr/include'] This was why I asked. :-) > -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review