Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: erlang-gettext - Erlang internationalization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645801 Summary: Review Request: erlang-gettext - Erlang internationalization library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ReportedBy: lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx QAContact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: notting@xxxxxxxxxx, fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-gettext.spec SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-gettext-2.1.0-0.1.20101022gitb55cb72.fc12.src.rpm Description: Erlang internationalization library Koji scratchbuilds: F-14: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2548678 EL-5: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2548688 rpmlint: sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint ../RPMS/ppc/erlang-gettext-2.1.0-0.1.20101022gitb55cb72.fc12.ppc.rpm erlang-gettext.ppc: E: no-binary erlang-gettext.ppc: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib erlang-gettext.ppc: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/erlang-gettext-2.1.0/LICENSE 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: The first two messages are common to Erlang-related apps. They mean that we're trying to install arch-independent data into arch-dependent directory. Unfortunately that's how Erlang packages should be installed. The last message means that I added license text as is, s/o touching/editing it. I believe that it's a bad idea to change upstream-supplied licensing data. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review