Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: erlang-getopt - Erlang module to parse command line arguments using the GNU getopt syntax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638948 Summary: Review Request: erlang-getopt - Erlang module to parse command line arguments using the GNU getopt syntax Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ReportedBy: lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx QAContact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: notting@xxxxxxxxxx, fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-getopt.spec SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-getopt-0.3-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Command-line parsing module that uses a syntax similar to that of GNU getopt. This is one of the dependencies for rebar. Koji scratchbuild for F-14: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2503572 rpmlint messages: Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint ../RPMS/ppc/erlang-getopt-0.3-1.fc12.ppc.rpm erlang-getopt.ppc: E: no-binary erlang-getopt.ppc: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib erlang-getopt.ppc: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/erlang-getopt-0.3/examples/ex1.escript erlang-getopt.ppc: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/erlang-getopt-0.3/examples/rebar_test.escript erlang-getopt.ppc: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/erlang-getopt-0.3/examples/ex1.escript /usr/bin/env erlang-getopt.ppc: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/erlang-getopt-0.3/examples/rebar_test.escript /usr/bin/env 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings. Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: The first two messages are common for all erlang packages which are containing only beam-files (binary loading modules for Erlang VM) - they must be installed into arch-dependent directory. The rest of messages are about sample scripts. I have no strong feelings regarding whether they should have 644 or 755 perms. Feel free to suggest your own variant. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review