Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630932 --- Comment #6 from Naveen Kumar <nkumar@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-09-30 09:07:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > 1. Since you already split ibus-table-others into several subpackages, so > Obsoletes and Provides fields are useless. I have not removed Obsoletes field from the subpackages, since there were packages with the same name before kaio joined them in ibus-table-others. The tables are same. Updated Spec URL: http://nkumar.fedorapeople.org/ibus-table-others/1.3.0.20100907-3/ibus-table-others.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://nkumar.fedorapeople.org/ibus-table-others/1.3.0.20100907-3/ibus-table-others-1.3.0.20100907-3.fc13.src.rpm Koji Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2503543 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review