Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634036 --- Comment #2 from Robin Lee <robinlee.sysu@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-09-15 23:16:53 EDT --- * The first issue refer to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632808 * About namespaces We don't prefer using filesystem package. The python-zope-filesystem package has been retired. We make some fundamental packages in that namespace to co-own the namespace directory and use the provided .pth files to make the modules importable. And we don't want to employ the filesystem mechanism just for packages from the Zope world which uses a dozen of namespaces[1]. And we don't want to make a filesystem package for each namespace and also don't want to make an all-in-one filesystem package to contain all those namespaces. * About private-shared-object Python extension usually contains private-shared-object. are you going to popularize your method as a good practice over all Python packages? I will make this done and submit a review request for python-zope-i18n a moment later. Spec files of all the ZTK packages have been done in my git[2]. [1] http://grok.zope.org/about/overview-of-namespaces [2] http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=cheeselee/public_git/zope-rpm.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/master;hb=master -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review