Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634036 --- Comment #3 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-09-16 01:05:23 EDT --- Okay, coownership for the zope namespace sounds like it makes sense. No need to require python-zope-filesystem. You do need a Requires on python-setuptools as explained in the other bug. Private shared object -- this method is good practice. But I haven't been requiring it unless the shared object is likely to provide a conflicting provide with something else that really needs it. It seems that the packaging guidelines that require doing this (and give a different example of how to) was moved into approved status but I don't remember us approving them: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering I need to try to find out whether those were moved into the accepted state by mistake or really had been approved. If they have, the page says that removing private shared objects is a must item and that you must use the procedure outlined on that page. Feel free to use the instructions there for filtering instead of what I wrote before. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review