Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614036 --- Comment #8 from Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking@xxxxxx> 2010-08-30 02:33:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > I know the > person who submitted the review request for extracc > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616881), namely Christophe. He is > very busy and may not have time to further maintain the extracc package. > Therefore, I may well maintain extracc as well, especially since it has been > approved by Mamoru Tasaka > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616881#c3). So, I would submit > extracc and stdair at the same time. OK, if Christophe isn't interested in extracc any longer (he should leave a comment about that in his review request), you can take his package once you're sponsored. > Besides, I indeed intend to maintain those package for EPEL. That's why I kept > some %{?el5:FOO} and %{?rhel:BAR} macros. That's fine, but you don't need these macros. Just add the BuildRoot tag and the %clean section, and clean $RPM_BUILD_ROOT at the beginning of %install. These additional lines work in EPEL and in Fedora. So, there's no need to distinguish between EPEL and Fedora here. BTW, are you still looking for a sponsor? If so, I'm willing to sponsor you. As a member of the packager group, you will be allowed to approve other people's packages. Thus, you should do two or three informal reviews before, in order to familiarize with the review process and to show an understanding of the Fedora guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review