[Bug 614036] Review Request: stdair - C++ Standard Airline IT Library - FE-NEEDSPONSOR

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614036

--- Comment #7 from Son Nguyen Kim <nguyenkims@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-08-29 17:48:01 EDT ---
Thanks! The new specification and source RPM are:
SpecURL: http://subversion.assembla.com/svn/stdair/stdair.spec
SRPM Spec:
http://subversion.assembla.com/svn/stdair/stdair-0.3.0-2.fc13.src.rpm

> Unfortunately, that's not possible. Your package can't be approved as long as
> it bundles a library. Thus, you should prepare your package as if extracc was
> already available. As a consequence, extracc blocks stdair, and you have to
> wait until it's approved.

Yes, of course, I did not intend to violate the guideline
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries). I know the
person who submitted the review request for extracc
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616881), namely Christophe. He is
very busy and may not have time to further maintain the extracc package.
Therefore, I may well maintain extracc as well, especially since it has been
approved by Mamoru Tasaka
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616881#c3). So, I would submit
extracc and stdair at the same time.

Besides, I indeed intend to maintain those package for EPEL. That's why I kept
some %{?el5:FOO} and %{?rhel:BAR} macros.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]