Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614036 --- Comment #7 from Son Nguyen Kim <nguyenkims@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-08-29 17:48:01 EDT --- Thanks! The new specification and source RPM are: SpecURL: http://subversion.assembla.com/svn/stdair/stdair.spec SRPM Spec: http://subversion.assembla.com/svn/stdair/stdair-0.3.0-2.fc13.src.rpm > Unfortunately, that's not possible. Your package can't be approved as long as > it bundles a library. Thus, you should prepare your package as if extracc was > already available. As a consequence, extracc blocks stdair, and you have to > wait until it's approved. Yes, of course, I did not intend to violate the guideline (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries). I know the person who submitted the review request for extracc (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616881), namely Christophe. He is very busy and may not have time to further maintain the extracc package. Therefore, I may well maintain extracc as well, especially since it has been approved by Mamoru Tasaka (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616881#c3). So, I would submit extracc and stdair at the same time. Besides, I indeed intend to maintain those package for EPEL. That's why I kept some %{?el5:FOO} and %{?rhel:BAR} macros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review