Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614036 --- Comment #6 from Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking@xxxxxx> 2010-08-29 14:40:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Thank you very much for your suggestions ! Hi Son, you're welcome. > the libextracppunit is not still removed. It permit > someone who does not have libextracppunit can nevertheless use stdair. I'll > remove it when libextracppunit is passed the review. Unfortunately, that's not possible. Your package can't be approved as long as it bundles a library. Thus, you should prepare your package as if extracc was already available. As a consequence, extracc blocks stdair, and you have to wait until it's approved. Concerning your current spec file, you should replace %{?el5:FOO} and %{?rhel:BAR} with FOO and BAR, respectively. And completely drop %{?el5:BuildRequires: tetex-latex} The virtual package tex(latex) ensures that the correct packages are referenced (currently texlive-latex in Fedora, and tetex-latex in EPEL <= 5). Explicitly adding the BuildRoot tag and cleaning %{buildroot} also doesn't hurt. So if you plan to maintain this package for EPEL too, just add the corresponding lines as requested by the EPEL guidelines. Fedora also still accepts them. You can drop rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/lib%{name}.la rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/libextracppunit.la The preceding rm statement already removes all .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review