Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2006-11-13 07:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #79) > Patrice and Michael, what do you think of this? First I'd like to thank David for joining to this ticket. I am not sure that the argument about 1% users is a show stopper for inclusion in extras. As strange as it may look, having 1 fedora user use a program may be a sufficient reason to include it in extras. Indeed if this user really want to have a rpm to ease system management he will rebuild it locally anyway. But then if he rebuilds it locally, building it in extras isn't much additional work and then you get 'for free' easy reinstallation with yum install, interesting in case you move to another location or have to reinstall your computer, rebuild on all extras supported arches - interesting in case you buy a new computer, and more visibility for others to help you fix your package. And then if you have 2 users it becomes very interesting since it avoids double work on creating and rebuilding local rpms. Others may have different opinions, but even for packages I may be the only one to use in fedora (or even on earth) I prefer to have it in extras for the ease of system management it brings with. Anyway I don't think that build_tide_db, restore_tide_db should be shipped with libtcd anymore, as, if I understand well they aren't of much use now. However I still think that tideEditor may be usefull and is worth packaging. My current thoughts are that: * the issue of inter-dependencies is in fact moot, we want to use the tcd shipped by David, and since we cannot package it in fedora due to licensing the way things are done to help the user get it are right. * If David don't want to bring tideEditor in with Xtide, resplit tcd-utils .src.rpm and submit it separately. * split the main package the way you like, as I still think that most of what I said at the end of #Comment 75 is relevant. At least split off libtcd and libtcd-devel which would contain only the libtcd library and devel package. For xttpd/common package do what you prefer. * follow David decision regarding shared libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review