Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: spacewalk-backend - Common programs needed to be installed on the Spacewalk servers/proxies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612581 Summary: Review Request: spacewalk-backend - Common programs needed to be installed on the Spacewalk servers/proxies Product: Fedora Version: 13 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ReportedBy: msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx QAContact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: notting@xxxxxxxxxx, fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spacewalk-backend/spacewalk-backend.spec SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spacewalk-backend/spacewalk-backend-1.1.29-2.el6.src.rpm Description: Generic program files needed by the Spacewalk server machines. This package includes the common code required by all servers/proxies. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2305031 Beware of a lot rpmlint warnings. I'm going to explain them: spacewalk-backend.noarch: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/rhn it is just directory, all files and logrotate scripts are handled by subpackages spelling-error all are false negatives conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rhn/satellite-httpd/conf/rhn/* we track them as config files, but want them to be replaced during upgrade, no customization should be placed in these files non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rhn/default/* they are not config files, but rather templates for customizing /etc/rhn/rhn.conf for more details see BZ 523631 explicit-lib-dependency python-hashlib explicit-lib-dependency spacewalk-backend-xml-export-libs false negatives cause by lib suffix of required packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review