Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596449 --- Comment #5 from Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-05-26 16:03:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > > - NM-vpnc describes itself in the UI as for 'Cisco Compatible VPN' > > - This describes itself in the UI as for 'IPSec based VPNs (Openswan)' > > > > 1) this should use 'VPNs' instead of 'VPN' > NetworkManager-openswan has "VPNs". Not sure if i understood you correctly. It should be changed to 'VPN' to be consistent. > > 2) I don't know that '(Openswan)' is a useful detail to show the user > > > Showing Openswan is necessary, because it is only specific to Openswan. So > users should be able to know that this plugin only works with Openswan. No, the plugin will talk to any IPSEC gateway that implements the same xauth/PSK authentication. If you mean it only works with openswan as a backend for this NM vpn plugin, that should be expressed just with RPM dependencies, not with a UI string - the user shouldn't have to care that openswan is being used under the hood. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review