Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596449 --- Comment #4 from Avesh Agarwal <avagarwa@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-05-26 15:45:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Some non-packaging review points: > > - NM-vpnc describes itself in the UI as for 'Cisco Compatible VPN' > - This describes itself in the UI as for 'IPSec based VPNs (Openswan)' > > 1) this should use 'VPNs' instead of 'VPN' NetworkManager-openswan has "VPNs". Not sure if i understood you correctly. > 2) I don't know that '(Openswan)' is a useful detail to show the user > Showing Openswan is necessary, because it is only specific to Openswan. So users should be able to know that this plugin only works with Openswan. > Also, it appears that this only supports Cisco-style xauth+ike VPNs. As I > understand it, Openswan supports a variety of auth mechanisms (certificates, > etc.) that this isn't exposing. You are right. I am exposing only XAUTH and PSK based VPNs right now mainly like "road-warrior connections". But that does not mean that it not only works with Cisco VPN servers. It can also work other vpn servers that supports XAUTH+PSK. By doing this would help a lot to get feedback from various users who mostly use it with Cisco VPN servers. As I have NetworkManager-openswan helper in place now, adding other features would mainly require GUI changes only, and some minor changes in the helper. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review