Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596449 --- Comment #6 from Avesh Agarwal <avagarwa@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-05-26 16:19:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > > > - NM-vpnc describes itself in the UI as for 'Cisco Compatible VPN' > > > - This describes itself in the UI as for 'IPSec based VPNs (Openswan)' > > > > > > 1) this should use 'VPNs' instead of 'VPN' > > NetworkManager-openswan has "VPNs". Not sure if i understood you correctly. > > It should be changed to 'VPN' to be consistent. Ok. changed. > > > > 2) I don't know that '(Openswan)' is a useful detail to show the user > > > > > Showing Openswan is necessary, because it is only specific to Openswan. So > > users should be able to know that this plugin only works with Openswan. > > No, the plugin will talk to any IPSEC gateway that implements the same > xauth/PSK authentication. If you mean it only works with openswan as a backend > for this NM vpn plugin, that should be expressed just with RPM dependencies, > not with a UI string - the user shouldn't have to care that openswan is being > used under the hood. ok, changed. Thanks. Avesh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review