[Bug 566757] New: Review Request: strongswan - IKEv1 and IKEv2 based VPN suite

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: strongswan - IKEv1 and IKEv2 based VPN suite

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566757

           Summary: Review Request: strongswan - IKEv1 and IKEv2 based VPN
                    suite
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: low
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
        ReportedBy: johannes.russek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
         QAContact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
                CC: notting@xxxxxxxxxx, fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora


Spec URL:
http://developer.intra2net.com/git/?p=strongswan-rpm;a=blob_plain;f=strongswan.spec;hb=cb3f9a2c18ee8b2398737dcc6ce096221c87e782
SRPM URL:
http://developer.intra2net.com/git/?p=strongswan-rpm;a=blob_plain;f=strongswan-4.3.6-0.src.rpm;hb=cb3f9a2c18ee8b2398737dcc6ce096221c87e782
Description: Taken from the website: 

The strongSwan 4.3 branch supports both the IKEv1 and IKEv2 key exchange
protocols in conjunction with the native NETKEY IPsec stack of the Linux 2.6
kernel. The IKEv1 keying daemon pluto has been inherited from the strongSwan
2.8 branch whereas the IKEv2 keying daemon charon is based on a totally new
object-oriented and multi-threaded concept, with 100% of the code being written
in C. strongSwan's IKEv2 functionality has been successfully tested against 15
IKEv2 vendors during the third and fourth IKEv2 Interoperability Workshops in
2007 and 2008, respectively. 

Please check http://www.strongswan.org for a more detailed description of it's
features. 

I've been maintaining a more or less satisfactory spec file for our own usage,
but decided to try to maintain strongswan for fedora and epel with help of
another strongswan user (Gerd v. Egidy) who agreed to be a co-maintainer of
this package.

Most functionality is tested, except for the NetworkManager stuff since neither
me nor Gerd have the possibilites to test this extensively.
We've split up most of the functionalities into different subpackages to avoid
having to pull in a lot of dependencies if those features aren't used.

We are currently maintaing a git repository for our working on the spec at
http://developer.intra2net.com/git/?p=strongswan-rpm

Thanks,

Johannes

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]