Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: strongswan - IKEv1 and IKEv2 based VPN suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566757 Summary: Review Request: strongswan - IKEv1 and IKEv2 based VPN suite Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ReportedBy: johannes.russek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx QAContact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: notting@xxxxxxxxxx, fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://developer.intra2net.com/git/?p=strongswan-rpm;a=blob_plain;f=strongswan.spec;hb=cb3f9a2c18ee8b2398737dcc6ce096221c87e782 SRPM URL: http://developer.intra2net.com/git/?p=strongswan-rpm;a=blob_plain;f=strongswan-4.3.6-0.src.rpm;hb=cb3f9a2c18ee8b2398737dcc6ce096221c87e782 Description: Taken from the website: The strongSwan 4.3 branch supports both the IKEv1 and IKEv2 key exchange protocols in conjunction with the native NETKEY IPsec stack of the Linux 2.6 kernel. The IKEv1 keying daemon pluto has been inherited from the strongSwan 2.8 branch whereas the IKEv2 keying daemon charon is based on a totally new object-oriented and multi-threaded concept, with 100% of the code being written in C. strongSwan's IKEv2 functionality has been successfully tested against 15 IKEv2 vendors during the third and fourth IKEv2 Interoperability Workshops in 2007 and 2008, respectively. Please check http://www.strongswan.org for a more detailed description of it's features. I've been maintaining a more or less satisfactory spec file for our own usage, but decided to try to maintain strongswan for fedora and epel with help of another strongswan user (Gerd v. Egidy) who agreed to be a co-maintainer of this package. Most functionality is tested, except for the NetworkManager stuff since neither me nor Gerd have the possibilites to test this extensively. We've split up most of the functionalities into different subpackages to avoid having to pull in a lot of dependencies if those features aren't used. We are currently maintaing a git repository for our working on the spec at http://developer.intra2net.com/git/?p=strongswan-rpm Thanks, Johannes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review