Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566757 --- Comment #3 from Johannes Russek <johannes.russek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-02-19 11:48:59 EST --- well, they both use /etc/ipsec.d, /etc/ipsec.conf and /etc/ipsec.secrets, both provide /usr/sbin/ipsec and both provide a daemon named pluto that binds to the same port to name a few. it would basically mean renaming almost everything to make it non-conflicting and tbh i don't much see the point of having both openswan and strongswan on the same machine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review