[Bug 210464] Review Request: anjuta-2 - A very capable IDE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: anjuta-2 - A very capable IDE


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210464





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2006-10-14 08:37 EST -------
(In reply to comment #6) 
> 2. Odd...
What do you mean by this? I meant that for example,
* you wrote "glib2-devel", however, this is required by gtk2-devel so
  writing "glib2-devel" is not necessary. (And gtk2-devel is required by
   libglade2-devel.....)
  Write the "minimal" Requires and BuildRequires so that users can check
  the dependency as easily as possible.

* I strongly doubt that writing "gtk2, ORBit2, gnome-vfs2....." to Requires is
  needed because libraries' dependency pulls them. Especially, why
  "glib"?

> 6. Not a problem.
* What do you mean? Adding "pkgconfig libgnomeui-devel libglade2-devel" is
  necessary as you can see in "Requires" section of
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines .
  Dependency for -devel package cannot be automatically checked by rpmbuild.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]