Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210464 Summary: Review Request: anjuta-2 - A very capable IDE Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ReportedBy: paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx QAContact: fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx Spec URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/anjuta-2.0.2-5.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/anjuta2.spec Description: This is the current release of the anjuta IDE. It has a lot of changes from the now depricated 1.2.4a branch and seems a lot more stable. Anjuta-1.2.4a is already in extras (maintained by me). This version builds happily in and out of mock. rpmlint does throw up some complaints of devel parts being in the non-devel package and some files being empty. These are deliberately there as they are used as blank forms/pre-produced code when you start anjuta-2 and begin a new project. The only other error is that anjuta2.spec is not a valid filename for a spec file. As anjuta-1.2.4a is still in FC5 (and will be until I'm happy with the stability of anjuta-2), I need to be able to differentiate between the two and this seems the most logical. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review