Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anjuta-2 - A very capable IDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210464 ------- Additional Comments From paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-10-14 08:12 EST ------- 1. Anjuta has a wizard which gives you small, but fully functioning applications when you select them. The files rpmlint has picked up are those - they are not devel files, but are part of the package. This is one of those occasions where rpmlint is being over-cautious. If I remove the zero byte files then Anjuta doesn't like it and the packages created are missing the files. I also can't use anjuta.spec as that is the name used for anjuta-1.2.4a which is still in core. When both core and devel are in sync, then I'll rename the spec file. 2. Odd... 3. If you don't have them, when anjuta-2 is run bits fall apart. This was recently seen with monodevelop where I needed to add another package as a requires as well as having the devel. 4. Good catch 5. Fair point - I'm probably being over cautious 6. Not a problem. Should all be happier on the next run -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review