Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ballbuster - Move the paddle to bounce the ball and break all the bricks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210183 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik@xxxxxxxxx 2006-10-10 16:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > I was more concerned with "is it necessary?" than "will it error out?" (which, > right, it won't). Ultimately it doesn't matter, due to the --no-create (it > won't unnecessarily create the file). These scripts are certainly good, as they're used in many other packages and has their place in guideliens (in ScriptletSnippets) > Yes, but if hicolor-icon-theme gets removed before ballbuster, it won't take > the directory with it (as it's non-empty); when ballbuster gets removed > (assuming it's the last thing with anything in that directory), the directory > will remain on the system, unowned by anything (in an ideal world where it isn't > improperly owned by 11 other packages, anyway). But, I'll readily admit that > I'm not positive about that. :-) It looks like a really questionable thing. As far as I know, many packages contain their files in hicolor-icon-theme dirs and they don't have it as dependency. In fact, I'm still not sure if it's necessary at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review