Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508750 --- Comment #13 from David A. Wheeler <dwheeler@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-01-26 12:49:54 EST --- In case my previous comment wasn't clear, I see 3 scenarios for naming the cli command for removing files: 1. /usr/bin/trash and no /usr/bin/trash-put. "man trash" should work, and all docs refer to "trash" and not "trash-put" (since "trash-put" won't work). 2. /usr/bin/trash-put and no /usr/bin/trash. "man trash-put" should work, and all docs refer to "trash-put" (since "trash" won't work). 3. Both /usr/bin/trash and /usr/bin/trash-put (presumably one links to the other). "man trash" *and* "man trash-put" should work; once you start reading the docs, they can use either name (since either works). I suggest 1 or 3, as that would make trash-cli's use consistent with Debian and Ubuntu. That's at the cost of using a short name, but I think it's rational to give 'trash' a short name... it's widely useful. No matter what, the commands and their documentation should be *consistent*, and that's my main point :-). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review