Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508750 --- Comment #12 from David A. Wheeler <dwheeler@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-01-26 10:38:05 EST --- Well, in general, we try to be consistent with other distributions unless there's some specific reason to be different. E.G., we try to use consistent package names (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#General_Naming), and I think the same concept applies to program names too. I suggest using "trash", as expected by the docs. But clearly there is not packaging requirement *requiring* this. So, I guess I'll agree with comment #11 and say it's "maintainer's decision", but I think the docs and command name need to be consistent. So if the command is "trash-put", and "trash" is not accepted, then the documentation needs to describe "trash-put" instead (which it currently doesn't do). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review