[Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108





------- Additional Comments From panemade@xxxxxxxxx  2006-09-28 00:28 EST -------
(In reply to comment #66)
> Excellent to hear some positive testing reports both here and on the lists. 

Thanks to all whot tested this package.

> 
> In reply to comment #63:
> 
> It looks like the libgutenprintui libraries in the main package need gtk
> libgutenprintui.so.1
> libgutenprintui2.so.1
> 
> I don't know if they can be split off or not... Parag?

I don't think we should split them and create a new package. Those are part of
gutenprint-devel package. And as all *.so.1 files must go to -devel packages,
ther are already there. 

> 
> Parag: 
> 
> - Can you apply something like the changes from comment #58 with a proper
> changelog entry and upload a new spec/src.rpm?

Will do that later today.

> 
> - I just did another fc6/x86_64 build here and it worked. Either the problem I 
> was seeing before was something that was temp broken in devel, or there is some 
> kind of race condition in the build process that I managed to hit. 
> 
> - Can you also add '--disable-rpath' to the configure call? This shows up on 
> x86_64 rpmlint as: 
> E: gutenprint binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libgutenprintui.so.1.0.0 
> ['/usr/lib64']
> E: gutenprint binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/
> libgutenprintui2.so.1.0.0 ['/usr/lib64']
> E: gutenprint binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/ijsgutenprint.5.0 ['/usr/
> lib64']
> E: gutenprint-cups binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/sbin/cups-genppd.5.0 ['/
> usr/lib64']
> E: gutenprint-cups binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/cups/filter/
> rastertogutenprint.5.0 ['/usr/lib64']
> E: gutenprint-extras binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/testpattern ['/usr/
> lib64']
> 


Kevin,
 Sure will add --disable-rpath to ./configure in SPEC.
So same %{_libdir} macro worked for x86_64 right in mock build??


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]