Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-09-28 00:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #67) > > It looks like the libgutenprintui libraries in the main package need gtk > > libgutenprintui.so.1 > > libgutenprintui2.so.1 > > > > I don't know if they can be split off or not... Parag? > > I don't think we should split them and create a new package. Those are part of > gutenprint-devel package. And as all *.so.1 files must go to -devel packages, > ther are already there. Why should they be in the -devel subpackage? It was my understanding that only the unversioned shared object files must be in the -devel subpackage (*.so); and versioned libraries (*.so.N and so on) should be in the main package or a -libs subpackage or something similar, as appropriate. Is this not the case here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review