Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From kevin@xxxxxxxxx 2006-09-28 00:20 EST ------- Excellent to hear some positive testing reports both here and on the lists. In reply to comment #63: It looks like the libgutenprintui libraries in the main package need gtk libgutenprintui.so.1 libgutenprintui2.so.1 I don't know if they can be split off or not... Parag? Parag: - Can you apply something like the changes from comment #58 with a proper changelog entry and upload a new spec/src.rpm? - I just did another fc6/x86_64 build here and it worked. Either the problem I was seeing before was something that was temp broken in devel, or there is some kind of race condition in the build process that I managed to hit. - Can you also add '--disable-rpath' to the configure call? This shows up on x86_64 rpmlint as: E: gutenprint binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libgutenprintui.so.1.0.0 ['/usr/lib64'] E: gutenprint binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/ libgutenprintui2.so.1.0.0 ['/usr/lib64'] E: gutenprint binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/ijsgutenprint.5.0 ['/usr/ lib64'] E: gutenprint-cups binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/sbin/cups-genppd.5.0 ['/ usr/lib64'] E: gutenprint-cups binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/cups/filter/ rastertogutenprint.5.0 ['/usr/lib64'] E: gutenprint-extras binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/testpattern ['/usr/ lib64'] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review