Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #15 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus <stefan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-09-27 12:28:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > rpmlint reports some errors and a warning: > > > > ne7ssh.ppc: E: description-line-too-long applications. You can now use the > > NetSieben's API, instead of spending countless > > ne7ssh.src: E: description-line-too-long applications. You can now use the > > NetSieben's API, instead of spending countless > Hm, I don't see this warnings. What version of rpmlint you are using? > > $ rpm -q rpmlint > rpmlint-0.90-1.fc11.noarch I'm using the same version. But you should make yourself familiar with mock. It ensures that you have a clean build area. If you are really really unsure about your build you can try using koji. But before that you should use mock. I did a built for you on koji and still get the following errors/warnings: ne7ssh.ppc: E: description-line-too-long applications. You can now use the NetSieben's API, instead of spending countless ne7ssh.src: E: description-line-too-long applications. You can now use the NetSieben's API, instead of spending countless ne7ssh-devel.ppc: W: no-documentation ne7ssh-doc.noarch: E: devel-dependency ne7ssh-devel 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 1 warnings. > http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/ne7ssh/ne7ssh-1.3.1-3.fc11.src.rpm Whenever you change something at your package then do a release bump. I have two versions of your package (release 3): $ md5sum ne7ssh-1.3.1-3.fc11.src.rpm* 61b1be340be8e6572101f6a0d293ac3d ne7ssh-1.3.1-3.fc11.src.rpm bc8156ac376386796d5ef319b582d6f1 ne7ssh-1.3.1-3.fc11.src.rpm-BUMP_RELEASE_FORGOTTEN $ rpmdiff ne7ssh-1.3.1-3.fc11.src.rpm ne7ssh-1.3.1-3.fc11.src.rpm-BUMP_RELEASE_FORGOTTEN S.5.......T ne7ssh.spec $ diff -u a/ne7ssh.spec b/ne7ssh.spec ... -cmake . +CFLAGS="%{optflags}" CXXFLAGS="%{optflags}" cmake . ... This is the reason why the new package does not complain about debuginfo-without-sources anymore. Btw. it is also good practice to include the output of rpmlint everytime you create a new package (I forget that sometimes too). This helps you to find bugs before posting the new version and also helps reviewers etc. as a first impression. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review