[Bug 226302] Merge Review: pm-utils

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226302


Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx>  2009-09-26 16:13:30 EDT ---
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name. 
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. 
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. 
OK - License (GPLv2)
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
f69db402e1869321cac72ffd2f77fa99  pm-utils-1.2.5.tar.gz
f69db402e1869321cac72ffd2f77fa99  pm-utils-1.2.5.tar.gz.orig
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. 
OK - Package has a correct %clean section. 
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content. 
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. 
OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install

OK - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig
OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}

OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. 
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. 
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. 
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. 
OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions)
See below - No rpmlint output. 
OK - final provides and requires are sane.

SHOULD Items:

OK - Should build in mock. 
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should function as described. 
OK - Should have sane scriptlets. 
OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. 
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version
OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or
/usr/sbin
OK - check for outstanding bugs on package (merge reviews/rename/re-reviews).  

Issues: 

1. rpmlint says: 

pm-utils.src: W: strange-permission pm-utils-bugreport-info.sh 0775
pm-utils.src: W: strange-permission pm-utils-99hd-apm-restore 0775

I think we can ignore those. 

pm-utils.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/pm-suspend.log

Can be ignored per comment in the spec. 

pm-utils-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation

Can be ignored. 

2. Some non blocking suggestions: 

Might add a '-p' to your install lines to preserve timestamps of the sources?
Currently it's pointless to add smp_mflags, but if there are ever more source
files
to compile it might be worth considering. 

I see no blockers at all, so this package is APPROVED. 

Sorry for the long delay here.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]