Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #12 from Christian Krause <chkr@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-19 18:15:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > I'm aware of the guidelines and libvncserver, still this is a different matter. > The guidelines address the convenience copy of libraries carried in other > projects. Here the minilzo is by designed to be embedded. I understand your point. But unfortunately the fedora guidelines provide also arguments for the opposite. ;-) Since the whole problem is not only related to this review, but to all packages which are either using an internal minilzo or already use an external minilzo shared lib, I recommend the following: a) Let's bring the issue to the attention of the Fedora Packaging Committee and discuss it on their mailing list. I'll sum up the issue by mail today or tomorrow and send it to FPC. b) At the same time let's continue with the review for now. I think only this specific issue can be put on hold for now until there is an agreement with FPC. All other remarks regarding the package are still valid and needs to be addressed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review