Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499319 --- Comment #8 from Guido Grazioli <guido.grazioli@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-09 08:00:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #2) > > NEEDSWORK - The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and > > meet the Licensing Guidelines > > - some files are under CMU license (BSD like), fix the License tag > > CMU is compatible with GPL, and the CMU files are compiled with the GPL files, > resulting in a binary that is solely under GPL. Thus license tag is GPLv3+. > Ok, my bad, got that one now. > > NEEDSWORK - Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files must > > call ldconfig in %post and %postun > > - add ldconfig calls > > This wouldn't do anything since no libraries are installed in standard library > directories (and no file is shipped into /etc/ld.so.conf.d/). :) > ok; i tough that you might have /usr/lib/tcl8.5 in a file under /etc/ld.so.conf.d, provided by some other tcl- package. > (In reply to comment #4) > > About the NetSnmp library you ship and build with your package, isnt it already > > available on Fedora? you should try to avoid library duplicates in that case. > > There's no netsnmp library in the package, it links to the netsnmp library. Sorry, i was a bit confused here. This package ships the sources of the snmp tools, which are part of the upstream project, and are shipped with Fedora in net-snmp-utils. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review