Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499409 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> 2009-05-09 07:54:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > > - jar file must have same name as package: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#Jar_file_naming > > (drop the symlinking and just install %{name}.jar in %_javadir) > > > > - Same goes with javadocdir, don't version it. > > Ok for all other things, but why do you ask that? It seems that most java > packages come versioned and symlinked (for javadoc as well). It is a jpackage > guideline and there seems to be nothing opposing that in Fedora-java > guidelines; Because the Fedora Java Packaging Guidelines say so; JPackage guidelines have no say on this :) > As a side note, other packages originally coming from jpackage have Group: > Development/Libraries/Java instead of Development/Libraries (ie the > jakarta-commons-*.jar), but i used the last one to avoid an rpmlint warning. Yes, Development/Libraries/Java is not a standard group; a standard group must be used. > cheers (and thanks for your sponsorship!) No problem. You could still do a few other reviews of other packages. We need more reviewers! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review