Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499319 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> 2009-05-09 06:41:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > NEEDSWORK - The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and > meet the Licensing Guidelines > - some files are under CMU license (BSD like), fix the License tag CMU is compatible with GPL, and the CMU files are compiled with the GPL files, resulting in a binary that is solely under GPL. Thus license tag is GPLv3+. > NEEDSWORK - Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files must > call ldconfig in %post and %postun > - add ldconfig calls This wouldn't do anything since no libraries are installed in standard library directories (and no file is shipped into /etc/ld.so.conf.d/). :) (In reply to comment #4) > About the NetSnmp library you ship and build with your package, isnt it already > available on Fedora? you should try to avoid library duplicates in that case. There's no netsnmp library in the package, it links to the netsnmp library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review