[Bug 499319] Review Request: tcl-snmptools - TCL extension for SNMP support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499319





--- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx>  2009-05-09 06:37:06 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> - Why do you disable threading?  
Duh, you explaiend it in comment #1.


- You are not providing snmptools,
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Tcl#Naming_Conventions . This is OK,
considering the genericish base name of the package.

- Doesn't the version macro at 
 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Tcl#arch-specific_packages
work? Where does it fail?

- Have you tried the configure argument --libdir=%{tcl_sitearch} to change the
default install location?

- Do you really need to specify --with-tcl=%{_libdir}? OK, on multiarch arches
with both 32- and 64-bit versions installed you might get into trouble if
configure picks up the wrong version. No hurt having this if you think it's
necessary.



rpmlint output:
tcl-snmptools.src: W: invalid-license CMU
tcl-snmptools.x86_64: W: invalid-license CMU
tcl-snmptools-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license CMU
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.

- License tag should be MIT (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing ). But
this is really not necessary, since CMU is compatible with GPL and License:
GPLv3+ is enough.

MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a
duplicate. OK
MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used
consistently. OK
MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the 
Licensing Guidelines. OK

MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
NEEDSFIX
- See comment above, license tag should be just GPLv3+.

MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. OK
UST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A

MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSFIX
- Even though the files that are installed are generated, it's always nice to
preserve time stamps in install phase. Use INSTALL="install -p" as argument to
make install.

MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A

MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package
that owns the directory. ~OK
- Instead of
 %dir %{tcl_sitearch}/%{realname}%{version}
 %{tcl_sitearch}/%{realname}%{version}/*.so
 %{tcl_sitearch}/%{realname}%{version}/pkgIndex.tcl
just put
 %{tcl_sitearch}/%{realname}%{version}/
as this will own the directory and everything in it.

MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK
MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
MUST: Clean section exists. OK
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A

MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect
runtime of application. NEEDSFIX
- Add AUTHORS. BUGS and TODO should otherwise be included, but now they just
contain instructions to grep the code.

MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A
MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A
MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A
MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files
ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A
MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A
MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A
MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A
MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK
MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK
SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK
SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from
upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK
SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]