Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #11 from Mauricio Henriquez <buhochileno@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-03 18:05:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > I added the two patches as attachments to the bug. The first patch is against > the spec file and the second patch is against the unpacked source tarball. Both > patches fix the assumption that the libdir should be in prefix/lib (/usr/lib) > which works on x86 but not on x86_64 (where it is /usr/lib64). Also, the x86_64 > build does not work because of the pc file issue described in bug 490025 (which > I also wrote a patch for yesterday). I would mark it as a blocker, but I don't > seem to have access to do so. > > I'm not trying to take over your package, just fixing a few miscellaneous > issues that prevented me from compiling/installing/using/enjoying the package > myself. Is not what I meant, is just that you are making changes to a also newbie guy package, so I don't have a clue if your patchs are correct or not, thats is way I was waiting to some sponsor/experienced guys to let what to do with the packaes. But sure, if in the meantime you test some of your patch and you know that makes the magic, so then is a step forward, is just that we are going to wait for someone that really tell us that our changes are correct...Still have lot of doubts about how koji works, etc... Thanks!! Mauricio.. > > As a warning, I am new to both RPM packaging and the Fedora guidelines so I > could have committed a major sin. Please check my patches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review