Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 Ryan Bair <ryandbair@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ryandbair@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #10 from Ryan Bair <ryandbair@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-03 09:45:01 EDT --- I added the two patches as attachments to the bug. The first patch is against the spec file and the second patch is against the unpacked source tarball. Both patches fix the assumption that the libdir should be in prefix/lib (/usr/lib) which works on x86 but not on x86_64 (where it is /usr/lib64). Also, the x86_64 build does not work because of the pc file issue described in bug 490025 (which I also wrote a patch for yesterday). I would mark it as a blocker, but I don't seem to have access to do so. I'm not trying to take over your package, just fixing a few miscellaneous issues that prevented me from compiling/installing/using/enjoying the package myself. As a warning, I am new to both RPM packaging and the Fedora guidelines so I could have committed a major sin. Please check my patches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review