Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 --- Comment #9 from David Sugar <dyfet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-03 09:53:16 EDT --- That is a rather interesting question. Traditionally I have always shipped static libs as part of the -devel package just in case someone does actually want to build static linked, although I imagine is likely extremely rare to see this happen anymore for anything produced for a mainline distro (embedded on the other hand certainly...) outside I think of perhaps those who are creating proprietary/source secret binaries and I have no interest in that myself. Shipping static libs as a separate -static package seems acceptable to me, just like the debug package is separate from devel. The reason I set attr for ucommon-config is that automake/autoconf generated Make kept dropping the execute attribute when installing that file. All these changes I will add. I recall that historically %configure only had set CFLAGS with RPM_OPT_FLAGS, and NOT CXXFLAGS (hence C++ never by default built with optimizations). I gather this has changed... I like all of these comments and changes...I will also feed them back into the tarball generated spec upstream... Updated: http://www.gnutelephony.org/specs/ucommon-2.0.5-2.src.rpm http://www.gnutelephony.org/specs/ucommon.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review