Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489418 --- Comment #4 from Simon Wesp <cassmodiah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-04-14 03:04:02 EDT --- missing Rs: pexpect (for ssh) curlftpfs (for ftp) missing conflict: sbackup > So does nssbackup actually work without the gtk subpackage? yeah, it should be! Description: NSsbackup Common files package NSsbackup common files package. This package is not the software itself but contains the minimum set of files to make it run. > Does it work without ftp and ssh subpackages? yes! Description: NSsbackup Fuse SSH plugin NSsbackup SSH plugin. This package will permit to have the ability to make backups from and over an SSH location. This plugin use FUSE file systems. Description: NSsbackup Fuse FTP/SFTP plugin NSsbackup FTP and SFTP plugin. This package will permit to have the ability to make backups from and over FTP/SFTP location. This plugin use FUSE file systems. > Do the ftp and ssh subpackages bring new huge dependencies? ftp: curlftpfs (currently missing) ssh: sshfs, pexpect (currently missing) > And if ftp and ssh do not introduce a huge > dependency and the gtk interface is always needed, > I would say one package fits completely. You are a fan of splitting it? I'm not a fan of it, because ftp and ssh shouldn't be excluded as seperate modules and there is only one frontend. If there are 2 frontends for example i would split it in 3 packages, common with ftp and ssh support and in the guis gtk and qt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review