[Bug 489418] Review Request: nssbackup - (Not so) Simple Backup Suite for desktop use

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489418


Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |redhat-bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxxx
                   |                            |e




--- Comment #3 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-04-13 19:33:22 EDT ---
Simon, you're writing, that upstream splitting is common, gtk, ftp and ssh.
But much more important is: How is the dependency chain? So does nssbackup 
actually work without the gtk subpackage? Does it work without ftp and ssh
subpackages? Do the ftp and ssh subpackages bring new huge dependencies? I
would like to hear your answers. And if ftp and ssh do not introduce a huge
dependency and the gtk interface is always needed, I would say one package
fits completely.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]