[Bug 226483] Merge Review: tcsh

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226483





--- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx>  2009-04-05 05:39:13 EDT ---
rpmlint output:
tcsh.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/tcsh-6.15/Fixes
tcsh.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%postun rm
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

- Convert Fixes file to utf8 with iconv.


MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used
consistently. ~OK
- Some comments could be nice in the install phase, it would make the spec file
a lot easier to read and understand.

MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
NEEDSFIX
- The license in source code is 3-clause BSD, not BSD with advertising. Change
License tag to BSD.
- Contact upstream to clarify this, since CopyRight is 4-clause.

MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. ~OK
- The file matches but source URL is bad; now the correct url has old/ before
the release. Switch to newest release will fix this.

MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. NEEDSFIX

MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSFIX
- SMP make is not enabled.
- Use -p flag to install in install phase.

MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package
that owns the directory. OK
- Please change %{_mandir}/*/* to %{_mandir}/man1/*.1, since it's safer this
way.

MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect
runtime of application. NEEDSFIX
- Include BUGS and WishList in the package. Remember to convert the files to
utf8.

SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from
upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK
MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the 
Licensing Guidelines. OK
MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK
MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
MUST: Clean section exists. OK
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK
MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK
MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK
MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK
MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files 
ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK
MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency. OK
MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK
MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK
MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK
MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK
SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK
SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]