Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490576 --- Comment #7 from Guido Grazioli <guido.grazioli@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-19 12:53:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > The patching with perl/sed is OK too, maybe even a bit tidier. ok then > - The package includes documentation that can be built - please add > BuildRequires: hevea > BuildRequires: tex(latex) > > and > > make doc > > to the spec file. Include manual.ps and manual.html (and maybe also manual.dvi) > to documentation. The hevea package is not available for ppc64 because of problems with ocaml; i could copy the ExclusiveArch directive from hevea.spec (i already checked building of that package fails on ppc64), but i preferred to include conditionals %ifnarch to build html manual for archs other than ppc64 only (and provide just manual.ps for ppc64). The wiki doesnt seem to specify which way would fit best. Files here: http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/bibtex2html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review