Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482884 Iain Arnell <iarnell@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |CLC-INTERCAL - Compiler |CLC-INTERCAL - Compiler for |Language With No |the INTERCAL language |Pronounceable Acronym | --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell <iarnell@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-28 19:40:14 EDT --- Answer: No, I already maintain several other perl packages. No sponsor required. 1. Okay, description was a little weak. New text ripped from Debian package: Summary: Compiler for the INTERCAL language Description: This package provides a Perl-based compiler for the INTERCAL programming language, usable either from the command line or as a Perl module. CLC-INTERCAL is designed to be almost compatible with the original (Princeton 1972) compiler. It also implements several extensions to the original language, including support for object orientation, operator overloading and quantum computing. 2. Indeed. But RPM can't cope with hyphens in version numbers (and even if it could, it probably wouldn't realise that 1.-94.-2 is a higher version number than 1.-94.-3). It seemed appropriate for INTERCAL to seek a particularly obtuse solution, but on second thought... Since it's not yet a 1.0 release, how about Version: 0 and Release: 0.%{X}.1._94._2 (as a non-numeric pre-release tag). 3. %{summary} comment is moot if I stick the proper version into release tag; the offending sub-package is no longer necessary. Only Group: %{group} remains in UI-X sub-package. New Spec: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/CLC-INTERCAL.spec New SRPM: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/CLC-INTERCAL-0-0.0.1._94._2.fc11.src.rpm New Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1090063 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review