Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482884 Jochen Schmitt <jochen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jochen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-28 12:47:46 EDT --- Question: It this your first Fedora package? I ask this, because the package look like it's need some love. I try to summarize my first mind about this package: 1. At first, you should try to get a better description the package, so a user which want to install the package may got a idea, why he should try out this new programming language 2. Your have specified 0 as the global package version and add version information on the definition of subpackage. This is not ok, you should put the version information on the Version statement and the subpackage shouldn't have any version information in thier name. 3.) It's look very ugly, that you are using rpm macros for the whole content of the Summary and Group statement. Unfortunately, I either a sponsor or a perl packaging specialist, so I can't review your package, but I would show your some points which are needs some homework. If this you first package and you need a sponsor please set the FE-NEEDSPONSOR bug as a blocker. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review