Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480591 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx |paskalis@xxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-21 17:23:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > 3. kerkis calligraphic and the small caps variants clearly needs their own > > subpackage. Please make sure you only group in the same font subpackage fonts > > of the same family (differing only in weight, width or slant). I didn't check > > the others > > OK with the Calligraphic family. > > The SmallCaps files however define the font family to be "Kerkis", and not > "Kerkis-SmallCaps" or something like that. I put it therefore in the -serif > subpackage. Ok. However please note that both the w3c (in CSS) and Microsoft (in its whitepaper to new fonts authors) only define weight, width or slant as selection axis for font faces within a font family. So if the font files were created today, small caps would be a different font family. > It's kind of dead upstream, and considering that the primary force to create > the font was the usage in LaTeX, I don't think I will be very successful. I > will try though. xetex uses fontconfig IIRC > New spec and srpm in the same location > http://gallagher.di.uoa.gr/any/rpms/ctan-kerkis-fonts/ ❉❉❉ APPROVED ❉❉❉ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review